Decision No. 38/2025 of the Single-Member Court of First Instance of Corinth

Our senior associate  Panagiota Agoroudi  appeared on behalf of our firm during the hearing of our client’s opposition to the act of property seizure. By virtue of Decision No. 38/2025 of the Single-Member Court of First Instance of Corinth, our client’s opposition was upheld. Below is a relevant summary of the decision, which was published in all legal databases: Opposition to a property seizure report (Article 933 of the Greek Code of Civil Procedure) -The seizure report must include the necessary details for the description of the property, so as to leave no doubt about both its local and economic identity. -A doubt that may lead to annulment of the report arises when the report fails to mention a structure of significant size and value located on the property. -The court declares the auction null and void simply by finding that the description of the property and its components is so incomplete or inaccurate that it creates doubt about its identity, without examining whether such an incomplete or inaccurate description caused harm to the opposing party. -The joining (amalgamation) of two or more contiguous properties for the purposes of a business can occur without any intervening legal act, so that they functionally constitute a single property, which is then subject to the rights of the owner’s creditors; any one of these creditors has both the right and the obligation to seize the entire autonomous property. -Any later seizure following the amalgamation must be imposed on the single, unified property, which at that point is the only independent and distinct property in existence.